2 minute read
Posted by Chris Platts on 17 February 2026
One of the biggest shifts in hiring over the past year hasn’t been a new tool, it’s been behaviour.
Candidates are increasingly using AI to help them prepare, practise, and sometimes even complete pre-hire assessments. It’s understandable. The tools are accessible, the pressure to perform is high, and the line between “preparation” and “assistance” is becoming blurred.
For recruiters, this creates a new challenge:
How do you spot when performance might not reflect real-world ability — without turning the hiring process into an interrogation?
We’ve been thinking about this a lot.
Rather than adding friction or invasive proctoring, we’ve taken a different approach. We’ve introduced a small new signal within our candidate reports that helps hiring teams interpret results with greater context and confidence.
It doesn’t interrupt the candidate experience.
It doesn’t rely on webcams or monitoring software.
And it doesn’t label or accuse.
It simply gives recruiters an additional layer of insight — a subtle but incredibly effective cue that helps separate genuine performance from potentially assisted performance.
What we like most about this feature is its elegance. It works quietly in the background, integrates naturally into the existing report, and supports better decisions without changing workflows.
In hiring, more data isn’t always the answer.
Better signals are.
This is one of those signals.
Subscribe for insights, debunks and what amounts to a free, up-to-date recruitment toolkit.
ThriveMap creates customised assessments for high volume roles, which take candidates through an online “day in the life” experience of work in your company. Our assessments have been proven to reduce staff turnover, reduce time to hire, and improve quality of hire.
Not sure what type of assessment is right for your business? Read our guide.
The modern candidate selection process is having an identity crisis. On one side, speed. Automation. One-click apply. AI screening. Funnels that look more like e-commerce checkout flows than human decisions. On the other, reality: real jobs, real people, and real consequences when a hire goes wrong. Hiring teams are under pressure to move faster than […]
Continue reading
Most hiring teams are under pressure to improve time-to-fill.That makes sense, open roles create real operational pain. But speed doesn’t tell you whether the person who accepted the role will still be there in three weeks. And when candidates aren’t a good fit, it shows through early attrition, retraining costs, frustrated managers, and leadership asking: […]
Continue reading
How to build remote work culture More than half of employers now offer remote work. Yet over a third are actively pulling people back to the office, citing drops in productivity and culture. The problem isn’t location. It’s design. Most companies are still running office-era systems in a work model that no longer has an […]
Continue reading