5 minute read
Posted by Emily Hill on 8 May 2025
Work sampling assessments can be a powerful way to predict how candidates will perform in a role—but only if they’re well designed. When implemented poorly, they can backfire, creating a frustrating experience for candidates and hiring teams alike.
Let’s look at the common pitfalls when implementing work samples, what a well-executed work sample looks like, and how ThriveMap’s Realistic Job Assessments make it easy to get it right.
Hiring mistakes are expensive. From lost productivity and re-hiring costs to poor team morale and customer experience, the ripple effects of a bad hire can be significant. But many of these issues stem from one simple problem: candidates don’t truly understand what the job involves until it’s too late.
This disconnect leads to:
Work sampling assessments are tasks or exercises that replicate key parts of a job. They let candidates experience what the role actually involves, and allow hiring teams to evaluate relevant skills in context.
There are a few different types:
ThriveMap’s assessments combine all three, creating contextual, narrative-based assessments tailored to each role. Learn more about how ThriveMap assessments work here.
When done well, work sampling assessments offer huge advantages over CVs and traditional interviews. They are:
Check out our article on why Realistic Job Assessments are the future of hiring for more detail.
Even with the best intentions, it’s easy to go wrong. Here are the most common mistakes—and how ThriveMap helps you avoid them:
If the assessment doesn’t align with real job tasks, the results aren’t going to be accurate. Candidates may pass the test but struggle in the role.
How ThriveMap helps: Build a detailed job analysis using our free Signal tool, ensuring every assessment is rooted in what the job actually requires. This guarantees full alignment between the role and the assessment.
Asking candidates to spend hours on unpaid tasks is off-putting and risks losing the best people—especially for entry-level roles.
How ThriveMap helps: Our assessments are designed to be the right length—long enough to be predictive, short enough to respect candidates’ time. They’re remote, mobile-friendly, and perfect for high-volume roles.
When candidates don’t understand what’s being asked, they underperform—and you lose out on talent.
How ThriveMap helps: Our Smart Assessment Builder guides you through crafting clear, structured assessments in minutes. Or, let our team run workshops with your hiring managers to set clear hiring criteria from the start.
Inconsistent scoring opens the door to bias and makes it hard to compare candidates objectively.
How ThriveMap helps: Our assessments are scored consistently using pre-defined criteria. You get structured, comparable results without needing manual reviews.
When you’re hiring at volume—especially for entry-level roles—you need a repeatable, efficient way to assess candidates without overwhelming your team.
How ThriveMap helps: Our platform is built for scale. Whether you’re hiring for 10 or 10,000 roles, you can automatically send, score, and review candidates at speed. Plus, every candidate gets the same fair, engaging experience.
Using niche tools or culturally biased scenarios can disadvantage some groups and reduce your talent pool.
How ThriveMap helps: Our assessments are built to be inclusive, accessible, and role-relevant—giving everyone a fair chance to shine, regardless of background.
Many companies have seen significant improvements in hiring outcomes after switching to ThriveMap’s Realistic Job Assessments.
Take Wincanton, one of the UK’s largest logistics companies. Before ThriveMap, they faced high early attrition and misaligned candidate expectations.
After implementing our assessments, they saw:
Safelite, a leading vehicle glass repair company, replaced traditional hiring tests with ThriveMap’s assessments and saw:
One of the biggest hiring challenges today is early attrition—when new hires leave within weeks of starting. It usually comes down to one thing: the job wasn’t what they expected.
ThriveMap solves this by showing candidates exactly what the role involves before they say yes. In fact, companies using our approach see up to 55% lower early attrition, saving time, money, and hassle.
Hiring doesn’t have to be a guessing game. With ThriveMap, you can build realistic, role-specific assessments in minutes—or let us take care of the heavy lifting for you.
👉 Start using our Smart Assessment Builder or
👉 Book a personalised demo and see ThriveMap in action.
Ready to make hiring more accurate, inclusive, and human?
Subscribe for insights, debunks and what amounts to a free, up-to-date recruitment toolkit.
ThriveMap creates customised assessments for high volume roles, which take candidates through an online “day in the life” experience of work in your company. Our assessments have been proven to reduce staff turnover, reduce time to hire, and improve quality of hire.
Not sure what type of assessment is right for your business? Read our guide.
Hiring teams using Eploy can now improve the accuracy of their candidate selection by adding ThriveMap’s Realistic Job Assessments into their workflow. In entry level roles, first week attrition can exceed 50 percent, usually because the reality of the job doesn’t match what the candidate expected. This integration gives Eploy users something they cannot get […]
Continue reading
A guide to fair, consistent, and predictive selection methods for entry-level hiring. Every week another Reddit post goes viral, exposing the strange, improvised “tests” candidates face. And this week, one Reddit post summed up the whole problem in a single screenshot. A hiring manager proudly described their “punctuality test”: They join a Zoom call 15 […]
Continue reading
Personality tests can be useful tools in the right context. They offer structure, they give teams a shared language, and they can help people understand how they prefer to work. But when recruiters start using personality tests for hiring — especially as part of high-volume or frontline recruitment — things often go wrong. Misinterpretation, overconfidence […]
Continue reading