2 minute read
Posted by Chris Platts on 17 February 2026
One of the biggest shifts in hiring over the past year hasn’t been a new tool, it’s been behaviour.
Candidates are increasingly using AI to help them prepare, practise, and sometimes even complete pre-hire assessments. It’s understandable. The tools are accessible, the pressure to perform is high, and the line between “preparation” and “assistance” is becoming blurred.
For recruiters, this creates a new challenge:
How do you spot when performance might not reflect real-world ability — without turning the hiring process into an interrogation?
We’ve been thinking about this a lot.
Rather than adding friction or invasive proctoring, we’ve taken a different approach. We’ve introduced a small new signal within our candidate reports that helps hiring teams interpret results with greater context and confidence.
It doesn’t interrupt the candidate experience.
It doesn’t rely on webcams or monitoring software.
And it doesn’t label or accuse.
It simply gives recruiters an additional layer of insight — a subtle but incredibly effective cue that helps separate genuine performance from potentially assisted performance.
What we like most about this feature is its elegance. It works quietly in the background, integrates naturally into the existing report, and supports better decisions without changing workflows.
In hiring, more data isn’t always the answer.
Better signals are.
This is one of those signals.
Subscribe for insights, debunks and what amounts to a free, up-to-date recruitment toolkit.
ThriveMap creates customised assessments for high volume roles, which take candidates through an online “day in the life” experience of work in your company. Our assessments have been proven to reduce staff turnover, reduce time to hire, and improve quality of hire.
Not sure what type of assessment is right for your business? Read our guide.
A pre hire assessment can look sophisticated, feel engaging and process thousands of candidates without measuring anything especially useful. The quality of an assessment is not determined by how impressive the technology appears or how many question formats it contains. It depends on whether the assessment measures capabilities that genuinely matter in the job, produces […]
Continue reading
Job applications grew four times faster than job openings in the first half of 2024 alone, and that gap has only widened since. Gartner projects that by 2028, one in four job candidates globally will be fake: AI-generated profiles with fabricated resumes, cloned voices, and deepfaked video sitting through interviews that were never a real […]
Continue reading
Attention to detail is one of the most commonly assessed skills in recruitment, and for good reason. In many roles, the ability to spot errors, follow processes and work accurately has a direct impact on quality, compliance and customer outcomes. So it makes sense that employers invest in attention to detail tests. The problem is […]
Continue reading