One of the key themes we explored was the use of Game-Based Job Assessments.
Gamified tests incorporate game elements. In recent years, they have been popular with hiring teams as there is a perception that gamification makes the assessment process more enjoyable and reflect the brand as being fun.
However, we wanted to learn – what do candidates from different backgrounds think of game-based assessments?
When candidates believe that they may be unfairly treated due to these assessments, it can discourage individuals from diverse backgrounds from applying or succeeding in the recruitment process. This, in turn, can lead to a less diverse workforce, which can have various negative consequences for an organisation, including limited perspectives and reduced innovation.
2. Accuracy concerns
Candidates expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of gamified tests in selecting the best candidates for the job. They ranked these assessments as the least accurate method for job selection, suggesting a lack of trust in their ability to make fair and accurate hiring decisions.
3. Gender differences:
The survey revealed gender disparities in perceptions of gamified tests. A higher percentage of male candidates (80%) found them appealing compared to female candidates (61%).
Additionally, a smaller proportion of men (7%) disliked them compared to women (21%).
Moreover, more men (27%) expressed a strong willingness to take such tests when asked, compared to women (18%).
4. Age-related differences:
Older candidates (55+) were less enthusiastic about game-based tests, with 28% expressing disinterest, higher than the overall average of 13%.
Furthermore, 24% of this age group would feel annoyed if asked to take such an assessment, compared to the 13% overall average.
Alternative approach:
It’s evident that gamified tests may not effectively promote gender fairness, diversity, and inclusion in the hiring process, and they may inadvertently introduce bias, negatively impact the candidate experience, and hinder long-term retention and engagement among all employees.
If you’re considering alternatives to gamified tests, we recommend exploring Realistic Job Assessments.
For more information on this alternative, please visit: https://thrivemap.io/realistic-job-assessment/
Share
The ThriveMap Newsroom
Subscribe for insights, debunks and what amounts to a free, up-to-date recruitment toolkit.
About ThriveMap
ThriveMap creates customised assessments for high volume roles, which take candidates through an online “day in the life” experience of work in your company. Our assessments have been proven to reduce staff turnover, reduce time to hire, and improve quality of hire.
Not sure what type of assessment is right for your business? Read our guide.
Other articles you might be interested in
Best Talent Assessment Platforms in 2025: Features, Benefits, and How to Choose
In 2025, recruiters are navigating a hiring landscape unlike anything before. AI-enabled candidates are flooding the pipeline, making it harder than ever to distinguish genuine talent from algorithmically optimised applicants. With job applications skyrocketing and AI-generated resumes perfectly tailored to keyword scans, recruiters must stay one step ahead with smarter assessment tools to ensure quality […]
The “Great Expectation Mismatch”: Why Job Descriptions Are Just Fairy Tales in Disguise
Imagine If Job Descriptions Were as Misleading as Online Dating Profiles—Oh Wait, They Already Are There’s a reason why 55% of employees have quit a job due to a disconnect between the job’s portrayal in the recruitment process and the actual experience—a 15% increase since 2019, according to ThriveMap’s latest research. The hiring process is […]
The 3 best pre-Hire assessment Tools for graduate recruitment in 2025
The recruitment landscape is being reshaped by artificial intelligence, and hiring teams must adapt to stay ahead. This is particularly true in graduate recruitment, where over 50% of candidates are already using AI tools. The result? Recruitment processes are becoming faster, more competitive, and harder to navigate. For recruiters using pre-hire assessment tools, the rise […]