8 minute read
Posted by Chris Platts on 22 July 2020
The recent Talent Benchmarking Report indicates that just 23% of recruiters measure their quality of hire. In recruitment, “quality” is often seen as being ambiguous; after all, isn’t everyone’s idea of quality subjective? But it doesn’t need to be elusive.
If you know what to measure, it’s simple to track. And when it’s recorded accurately it can be improved accordingly.
We wrote a guide to fair hiring and we think you’ll really enjoy it.
Many recruiters shy away simply because they don’t know where to start, but for those that do, only 33% of TA professionals who measure quality of hire (QoH) feel like they’re using strong tactics to do so, and only 5% believe their tactics are top draw [2].
You’re probably wondering how can a company measure hiring quality. So, let’s get to it.
An employee’s ‘quality’ refers to the value a person brings to an organisation. ‘Value typically refers to an employee’s contributions to the company’s long-term success. This might include their daily tasks, how much they help others, or the notable improvement in work quality since their arrival. Quality of hire is, therefore, a measurement of this value after an initial period after joining the business (usually 3-12 months).
39% of talent leaders say that quality of hire is the most valuable metric for evaluating recruitment performance [1]. The measure, usually a hard number, can be leveraged to improve hiring strategy, minimise costs from hiring mistakes, and ultimately help your teams hire better employees.
In addition to measuring how successful a new hire becomes, hiring quality is also used to measure the success of the company’s recruiting efforts as a whole.
If the metric is low and new hires aren’t performing, you’ll need to look at the recruiting team. Why aren’t they sourcing and selecting suitable candidates?
The importance of this metric is undeniable. Despite its tricky nature, measuring QoH is worth it. It identifies any weaknesses in your hiring process so you can adjust and improve accordingly.
The first step in measuring QoH effectively is to decide which quality indicators to use. We recommend choosing a diverse range of criteria that give a holistic picture of the employee’s performance.
To begin with, let’s take a look at the most common indicators companies use.
LinkedIn found that role performance was the most popular measurement used to calculate quality[3]. It involves grading employee performance on a 100-point scale. Again, there is no standardized way to do this, you could use their manager’s appraisal forms, peer or customer ratings. Either way, it’s important to consider job performance while trying to measure a new hire’s quality.
How long are employees staying on? The longer an employee works for a business, the more they contribute. Track the turnover rates of new hires and who the top performers are, and then leverage this to calculate an overall score. Retention is trickier to measure than other metrics and can be influenced by factors outside of QoH.
Sometimes known as ramp-up time. This is how long a new hire takes to reach full productivity in their role at the company.
This is measured as the percentage of new hires who achieve full productivity within a set timeframe. One way to measure this is to look at a new hire’s percentage of goals achieved.
This represents the total net value that an employee brings to your organization. A person’s Employee Lifetime Value (ELV) is measured over their tenure at the organisation — from the first day to the last.
Pre-hire assessments are designed to help predict the top performers. This is a proactive measure to aid hirers in predicting QoH early on in the recruitment funnel. Look for scores on tests and aptitude assessments to indicate their likely performance in the role.
Example: A high-volume hiring client of ours recently discovered that candidates who score well on their customised pre-hire assessment were 3 times less likely to leave in the first 90 days and 5 times more likely to get a highly recommended performance rating.
At ThriveMap, we always combine pre-hire assessment data with post-hire performance data to make improvements to the predictive powers of our pre-hire assessments over time.
With your chosen indicators on hand, it’s time to calculate your hiring quality.
It’s important to state that a one-size-fits-all approach to QoH will not work. You’ll need to adapt the formula according to the organisation’s goals and priorities and the requirements of each individual position.
After finalising that criteria, use the following formula to measure it:
Enter the performance indicators most relevant to the position. These must be measured on a scale of 0-100 for consistency. If you’re not already using that scale in performance reviews, you’ll need to change things around. Otherwise, this formula will not work for you.
Google has put together a few examples to highlight how the formula works in practice:
Example #1: Employee A is a salesperson at a small marketing agency. HR decides to evaluate the quality of hire for salespeople based on sales goals, 360 reviews, and hiring-manager satisfaction scores. Employee A meets 100% of her sales targets in the first year. Her 360 reviews are positive, showing a 95% satisfaction rate among her peers. Her hiring manager reports that he is delighted with her performance; he rates her 92/100.
Example #2: Employee B is a receptionist at the same company. HR decided to evaluate the quality of hiring for this position based solely on 360 reviews and hiring-manager satisfaction scores. Employee B’s 360 reviews show an 80% satisfaction rate among his peers. His hiring manager rates his performance as a 75/100.
A new employee takes time to get up to speed with a new company. Don’t jump on the evaluation too quickly, or you won’t get useful insights. We recommend waiting at least 6 months before capturing data.
It’s also useful to calculate the overall QoH by averaging the scores of all your new employees. This will give you an idea of how effective your talent acquisition function is. To do this, use this formula:
You can also create a formula to be used companywide to calculate an overall quality of hiring score:
These formulas are there for your company to adapt. They need to fit around your business goals. Utilise them as a starting point that will guide you in the right direction.
Measuring new hire performance is all about getting the right data.
Some are easier than others, such as retention rates, turnover, and quantifiable performance goals – such as the number of sales.
However, other data sources are not typically part of the everyday reporting operations and can be difficult to watch. Surveys are your friend here and come in different forms:
One thing to remember is to try and keep things simple and not overcomplicate the process:
As the table below shows, companies aren’t exactly confident in their current QoH measurements:
Many companies use data to improve their hiring processes and reduce employee turnover. Recruiters know that to be successful, they must track key recruitment metrics and measure the effectiveness of their recruitment efforts.
Quality of hire has many useful applications, but don’t rely on it as your sole metric. Instead, use it as a signpost to guide you towards the best hires and refine your recruiting process.
We hope this post has explained that the process doesn’t have to be arduous. What’s required is a standardisation of your company’s approach to measuring hiring outcomes so the data you collect is consistent and can be compared.
We wrote a guide to fair hiring and we think you’ll really enjoy it.
Subscribe for insights, debunks and what amounts to a free, up-to-date recruitment toolkit.
ThriveMap creates customised assessments for high volume roles, which take candidates through an online “day in the life” experience of work in your company. Our assessments have been proven to reduce staff turnover, reduce time to hire, and improve quality of hire.
Not sure what type of assessment is right for your business? Read our guide.
goeasy, a leading provider of consumer loans in Canada, aimed to transform their entry-level hiring process and selected ThriveMap’s pre-hire assessment tools. In this interview, Mark Michel, goeasy’s Retail Talent Acquisition Manager shares how incorporating Realistic Job Assessments into their entry-level hiring process has transformed their recruitment strategy. Here’s what he had to say: Q: […]
Continue reading
Berkeley Group, a leading property developer and house-builder, used ThriveMap’s pre-hire assessment tools to help implement a blind recruitment process for their apprenticeship scheme. The new approach helped to improve diversity, avoid hiring bias, and ensure candidates with the most potential were selected. We spoke with Catherine Hawkett, their Group Future Skills Manager, to learn […]
Continue reading
In many organisations, the relationship between talent acquisition and hiring managers has gone awry. Hiring managers are taking recruiting into their own hands. They’re briefing third-party agencies to fill positions or even conducting their own outreach. This often results in hiring managers and recruiters looking for different qualities in new hires, leading to a disconnect. […]
Continue reading